• Contact
  • Events
  • Projects
    • Music
    • PERSIAN CATS
    • Reporting & Interviews
    • Reza Saberi’s books
  • Human Rights
  • About
  • My Book
    • Between Two Worlds Images
    • Reading Guide
  • Blog

Roxana Saberi

Roxana Saberi

This is the official website of Roxana Saberi, a journalist, author, speaker, and human rights advocate. Her book Between Two Worlds tells the story of her 2009 arrest and captivity in Iran.

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Please help call for the freedom of Iranian students

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

Please take a moment to sign this online letter calling on Iran’s government to release all student prisoners of conscience; end its practice of discrimination in university admission and enrollment; and allow students to freely practice their right to expression, association, and assembly.

International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran:

Video:  Iran’s Future Held Captive

Between April 2009 and September 2011, Iranian authorities arrested at least 436 students, and sentenced 254 students, many of whom were mistreated in prison. At least 364 students have been barred from continuing their education, many for their political as well as religious beliefs. Currently, there are over 30 students detained in Iran.

Your message will be sent to the following Iranian government officials:  Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President; Mohammad Javad Larijani, Head of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights; Ayatollah Sadegh Larijani, Head  of the Judiciary; Ali Akbar Salehi, Minister of Foreign Affairs; and Hamid Reza Haji Babaee, Minister of Education.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

CPJ: 10 Most Censored Countries

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

10 Most Censored Countries

Committee to Protect Journalists’ new analysis identifies Eritrea, North Korea, Syria, Iran as worst

Published May 2, 2012

NEW YORK
Shutting out international media and imposing dictatorial controls on domestic coverage, the Horn of Africa nation of Eritrea has emerged as the world’s most censored country, the Committee to Protect Journalists has found in its newly updated analysis of press restrictions around the globe. Following closely on CPJ’s 10 Most Censored Countries list are North Korea, Syria, and Iran—three nations where vast restrictions on information have enormous implications for geopolitical and nuclear stability.

No foreign reporters are granted access to Eritrea, and all domestic media are controlled by the government. Ministry of Information officials direct every detail of coverage: “Every time [a journalist] had to write a story, they arrange for interview subjects and tell you specific angles you have to write on,” an exiled Eritrean journalist told CPJ, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. “We usually wrote lots about the president so that he’s always in the limelight.” So when President Isaias Afewerki dropped out of public view for a time last month, his citizens and the international community were left with only rumors about his well-being.

North Korea, which topped CPJ’s previous list of most censored countries, published in 2006, remains an extraordinarily secretive place with nearly all domestic news content supplied by the official Korean Central News Agency. As North Korea moved down a notch, to second on this year’s list, some tiny cracks have emerged: The Associated Press this year opened a bureau in the capital, Pyongyang, and a Japanese editor is working with a handful of volunteers to document daily life in North Korea and smuggle out the recordings. But issues with vast worldwide implications—including North Korea’s long-standing bid to build nuclear weapons and its new political power structure—remain hidden beneath severe censorship.

Censorship has intensified significantly In Syria and Iran in response to political unrest. Syria moved from ninth on CPJ’s 2006 list to third in this analysis; Iran, unranked in 2006, shot up to number four on CPJ’s new list. By barring international media from entering and reporting freely and by attacking its own citizen journalists, Syria has sought to impose a news media blackout on a year-long military crackdown that has roiled the international community. Iran has mixed high-technology techniques such as Web blocking with brute-force tactics such as mass imprisonment of journalists to control the flow of information and obfuscate details of its own nuclear program.

A North Korean tank moves past local journalists during an April military parade in Pyongyang. (AP/Ng Han Guan)

A North Korean tank moves past local journalists during an April military parade in Pyongyang. (AP/Ng Han Guan)

“The censorship of the media existed far before the revolution, but it has increased since because [President Bashar] al-Assad wants to convey a particular picture to the outside world that the regime is fighting off terrorists who are causing the unrest,” Eiad Shurbaji, a Syrian journalist who fled the country in January for fear of his life, told CPJ.” Another tenet of Syria’s propaganda was that minorities would be at risk without the regime, he said. “Media censorship played a huge role in keeping Assad in power.”

CPJ’s 10 Most Censored Countries, released to mark World Press Freedom Day, May 3, also includes, in order: Equatorial Guinea, where all media is controlled, directly or indirectly, by President Teodoro Obiang; Uzbekistan, where there is no independent press and journalists contributing to foreign outlets are subject to harassment and prosecution; Burma, where a series of reforms have not extended to rigid censorship laws; Saudi Arabia, which, like other Middle Eastern countries, has tightened restrictions in response to political unrest; Cuba, where the Communist Party controls all domestic media; and Belarus, where the most recent of many crackdowns by Aleksandr Lukashenko has sent the remnants of independent media underground.

In making its selections, CPJ closely considered six other countries that are heavily censored: Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, China, Sudan, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam. By exporting censorship techniques, China plays a particularly harmful role worldwide.

Among the list of 10 most censored, Saudi Arabia is a new entry. Cuba dropped from seventh in 2006 to ninth this year as authorities recently released more than 20 imprisoned journalists and a vibrant (though persecuted) community of independent bloggers has emerged. Burma has moved from second on CPJ’s previous list to seventh on this analysis because it, too, released a number of imprisoned journalists and informally loosened, at least temporarily, restrictions on reporting for locals and foreigners alike.

Burma’s military-backed government allowed foreign journalists into the country to cover a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in December and a landmark by-election in April. “But between those two events, with limited exceptions, the government ignored visa requests from major international news organizations, making it impossible for them to visit the country unless they did so undercover as tourists. Also, visas to cover the April 1 election were valid for five days only, after which all officially approved foreign reporters had to leave en masse,” one Southeast Asia-based reporter for an international news outlet told CPJ. He spoke on condition of anonymity, in order not to jeopardize his ability to report from the country. As for local reporters in Burma, he said, “they are able to report on small domestic protests or rallies and photograph policemen without getting in trouble. They are also often posting articles directly to Facebook and other websites without clearing them with censors,” but they remain wary of the risks entailed in critical journalism.

The 10 most restricted countries employ a wide range of censorship techniques, from the sophisticated blocking of websites and satellite broadcasts by Iran to the oppressive regulatory systems of Saudi Arabia and Belarus; from the dominance of state media in North Korea and Cuba to the crude tactics of imprisonment and violence in Eritrea, Uzbekistan, and Syria.

A photographer is obstructed as people flee a  Syrian Army attack in Idlib in March. (AP/Rodrigo Abd)

A photographer is obstructed as people flee a Syrian Army attack in Idlib in March. (AP/Rodrigo Abd)

One trait they have in common is some form of authoritarian rule. Their leaders are in power by dint of monarchy, family dynasty, coup d’état, rigged election, or some combination thereof. In Eritrea, President Isaias Afewerki was elected by the National Assembly in 1993, but has since managed to hold off elections and the implementation of a constitution, largely by imprisoning critics and obliterating the private press.

Indeed, disputed legitimacy of leadership is at the heart of censorship and media crackdowns in many places. Syria has long been a tightly controlled country, but last year, when regular demonstrations began to call for the ouster of Assad, foreign correspondents were restricted and locals who reported on the uprisings were arrested; the dangerous task of reporting on Assad’s brutal military response was left to courageous citizen journalists and foreign reporters who sneaked into the country. Iran became vastly more repressive after the disputed 2009 election returned President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power. Tehran—which once withheld subsidies and issued short prison sentences to keep critical journalists quiet—now closes news outlets, expels foreign media, imprisons dozens on lengthy terms, and seizes property. Saudi authorities—growing wary as regional uprisings ousted leaders in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya—added further restrictions in 2011 to the country’s media law, imposed new regulations on Web publications, and banned at least three columnists who had written about the region’s political unrest.

Lagging economic development is another notable trend among heavily censored nations. Of the 10 most censored countries, all but two have per capita income around half, or well below half, of global per capita income, according to World Bank figures for 2010, the most recent available. The two exceptions are Saudi Arabia and Equatorial Guinea, where oil revenues lead to much higher per capita income than the global level. But both of those countries are beset by vast economic inequities between leaders and citizens.

To determine this list, CPJ staff judged all countries according to 15 benchmarks. They included blocking of websites; restrictions on electronic recording and dissemination; the absence of privately owned or independent media; restrictions on journalist movements; license requirements to conduct journalism; security service monitoring of journalists; jamming of foreign broadcasts; blocking of foreign correspondents. All of the countries on the list met at least 10 benchmarks.

For this list, CPJ considered only countries where restrictions are imposed directly by the state. In Somalia and vast sections of Mexico, journalists practice extensive self-censorship in the face of extralegal violence.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

LAT: Books may be kept out of Tehran fair — but not off its streets

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Los Angeles Times
April 30, 2012

TEHRAN — As hundreds of thousands of bookworms converge on this capital, Iranian writers are pleading with the government to loosen its grip and allow a banned publisher into the Tehran International Book Fair.

The 10-day book fair, which kicks off Tuesday at the Grand Mosque Mosalla, bills itself as “the most important publishing event in Asia and the Middle East,” drawing an average of 550,000 visitors a day. Though most publishers come from the Islamic world, the festival also welcomes Western companies hawking scientific or technical titles such as “Bioeconomics of Fisheries Management” and “Succeeding with Technology” — and any other books that abide by “Islamic values.”

That may have tripped up a disputed Iranian company, Cheshmeh, which had its license suspended late last year, halting the presses that printed Western philosophy, Iranian short stories, history books from Cambridge and the Orhan Pamuk novel “My Name Is Red,” among other titles.

Iranian officials haven’t explained why the company was shut down, despite the outcry from writers and publishers. It had been one of several publishers accused of promoting a Western lifestyle.

An online petition that includes writers and translators expressed concern about Cheshmeh’s suspension and absence from the book fair, saying it made the selection of books available in Iran “thinner and weaker.”

The Tehran book fair has clamped down on publishers before: Two years ago the government refused to allow any books into the fair that had been approved for publication before 2005, when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad became president. Iranian officials have confiscated books and shut down stalls in the past.

But even if Cheshmeh and other publishing houses are ultimately shut out of the annual festival, their books won’t necessarily be shut out of Iran. Despite the firm dictates of religious and cultural ministers, a vibrant underground market for banned books and movies exists in Tehran.

“Give me any banned or illegal book. I can copy it exactly like the original one in less than a week and market it in the network across the country,” one Tehran man boasted. “Any book that’s banned will be a hit in the market.”

The street stalls are called nayab foreshi, Farsi for “rarely available items.” Yet the forbidden books are actually very much available, albeit at a price. Books and films banned by Iranian authorities are pirated within days and sold at inflated prices by street vendors who risk months in jail for shilling the forbidden tales.

Pirated copies of the Gabriel Garcia Marquez novella “Memories of My Melancholy Whores,” banned years ago as pornography, can still be found just outside Tehran universities. The prohibited film “Santoori,” about a dulcimer player addicted to drugs, is readily available on DVD on Tehran sidewalks not far from where Friday prayers are held.And on Revolution Avenue, street vendors sell Farsi translations of “The Right to Heresy,” a dense text about religious reformation that became popular with reformists after defeated presidential candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi suggested it. The book, once sold for less than $2, has nearly tripled in price after being banned.

Those prices have made sellers willing to take the risk of hawking banned books instead of approved titles. Several booksellers told The Times they had been locked up for anywhere from six months to two years, yet went on selling once they were freed.

“I can show you hundred titles of the books Xeroxed or on CDs sold in massive numbers right here in the sidewalks opposite Tehran University,” lamented Majid Taleghini, a publisher in Tehran. “We publishers are bankrupt and book smugglers are making a fortune. So what is the use of censorship?”

Frustrated writers say getting books past the government gantlet can take years, making it hard to eke out a living, even as the black market flourishes. Books must be submitted to the Cultural and Islamic Guidance Ministry, which picks out any offensive words, phrases or even whole paragraphs and insists on changes before texts can be printed.

The lags have upset writers as much as the censorship has. Journalist Emili Amraei, daughter of Asadollah Amraei, a prolific translator, complained her father couldn’t pay his bills because the ministry had taken four months to pore over his translated novel.

“This is our bread,” she wrote last week in the reformist daily Etemad.

Although the underground market has aggravated underpaid writers, it has been a boon to the tottering Iranian opposition, allowing it to spread its ideas to its followers even as its leaders languish under house arrest. The same ideas are also spread covertly, as writers disguise dissident ideas in literary code in hopes of getting them past the scrutiny of censors.

And the scrutiny has only increased with time. “Yes, political issues were censored before the revolution,” the Tehran bookseller mused over his illegal wares, “but not Marquez or Faulkner. Now even classical literature may be censored.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

RSF: AILING WOMAN JOURNALIST ARRESTED, GOVERNMENT DECREES NEW MEDIA CONTROLS

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Reporters Without Borders
April 25, 2012
(In Farsi)

Ailing woman journalist arrested, government decrees new media controls
PUBLISHED ON WEDNESDAY 25 APRIL 2012.

Reporters Without Borders strongly condemns the arrest of Narges Mohammadi, a journalist and spokesperson of Nobel peace laureate Shirin Ebadi’s Centre for Human Rights Defenders. She was detained in the northern city of Zanjan on 21 April after receiving an intelligence ministry summons and was transferred to Tehran’s Evin prison to serve a six-year jail sentence.

The press freedom organization also deplores a 21 April government decree making it obligatory for news agencies and other news media to always identify the source of any information they publish.

Originally arrested at her home on 10 June 2010, Mohammadi had a nervous breakdown and became seriously ill while held, and was provisionally released on 2 July 2010. She was sentenced two months later to 11 years in prison on charges of collaborating with the Human Rights Defenders Centre, “meeting and conspiring against the Islamic Republic” and anti-government propaganda. The sentence was reduced to six years on appeal on 4 March 2011.

Mohammadi’s husband, fellow journalist Taghi Rahmani, told Reporters Without Borders he is very worried about her deteriorating health. Rahmani, who has worked for many media since 1981, has also been constantly harassed by the security services and has spent a total of 14 years in Iranian prisons. He finally fled the country earlier this year.

Adopted at a cabinet meeting on 21 April, the decree defining “executive regulation of the press law” states that its goal is “organizing the activities of news agencies and electronic media and exercising more control over their work.” It says news agencies, like other media, must “identify the origin of the information they publish” and are “forbidden to quote information from websites that have been blocked or newspapers that have been suspended.”

When parliament amended the press law in August 2009, it added the following phrase to the first article: “News agencies have the same rights and responsibilities as the print media.”

The Islamic Republic’s first press law, adopted in 1985, aimed to implement the constitution’s vague statement of media freedom principles but it was also very imprecise. It was reinforced by an explicitly repressive package of measures that conservatives rushed through the fifth parliament in April 2000 with the aim of reining in the reformist press. Since then, the judicial authorities have repeatedly banned reformist newspapers.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Winners of the “For Press Freedom” Video Contest Announced

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012
Congratulations to the winners of the “For Press Freedom” Video Contest!  It was an honor to be one of the judges.
—————————————————-
Reporters Without Borders USA, CNN and the Ford Foundation are pleased to announce the winners of the “For Press Freedom” Video Contest, a nationwide competition challenging university students to create a video PSA that will air on CNN on World Press Freedom Day, May 3, 2012.

The winning video was created by Cassandra Stagner and Wil Granaderos from Western Michigan University.

The international jury of journalists and human rights defenders selected the winning video answering the question “Why should we care about freedom of information?” based on quality, creativity, message and impact. The winning video will air on CNN on May 3, 2012, World Press Freedom Day. The winners will be honored this day at CNN in New York among journalists and human rights activists. The “For Press Freedom” video contest is made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation.

The jury members include CNN anchor Anderson Cooper, CNN Worldwide executive vice-president and managing editor Mark Whitaker, Calvin Sims from the Ford Foundation, Reporters Without Borders executive director Olivier Basille, Reports Without Borders USA chairman Peter O. Price, Iranian-American journalist Roxana Saberi, Bashana Abeywardane of Sri Lanka’s Journalists for Democracy, Bahraini journalist Nada Alwadi and Academy Award nominated documentary filmmaker of Hell and Back again Danfung Dennis.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The final video of the “Angels of Iran” series on human rights in Iran

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012

ANGELS OF IRAN | A VOICE FOR THE VOICELESS: ROXANA SABERI

The story of Roxana Saberi’s time in prison with Mahvash Sabet and Fariba Kamalabadi, two of The Yaran (“the Friends”), sentenced to 20 years in prison simply for helping administer the needs of the Baha’i community in Iran. Featuring journalist Roxana Saberi and Elise Auerbach, Iran Specialist for Amnesty International USA.

Roxana:  ”I think the lessons that Mahvash and Fariba taught me in prison are universal. And they can apply to anybody, anywhere in the world. You don’t have to be in prison. We have our own prisons, are own adversities, and we can try to turn those adversities into opportunities.”
EXECUTIVE PRODUCER: David Hoffman
PRODUCER / DIRECTOR: Jeff Kaufman
EDITOR / FIELD AUDIO: Daniel Kaufman
ASSISTANT EDITOR: Emett Casey
CINEMATOGRAPHY: Colin Trenbeath
A Single Arrow Productions film

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

“Obama’s new sanctions against Syria, Iran take aim at digital harassment”

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

McClatchy Newspapers
By Lesley Clark
April 23, 2012

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama took aim Monday at Syria and Iran, imposing new sanctions on the two regimes as well as the “digital guns for hire” that develop technology enabling the two governments to monitor, track and harass their own people.

The same satellite communications, mobile phone and Internet technology used by activists across the Middle East and North Africa to speak to the outside world is being used against them in Syria and Iran, amid a “deplorable and deteriorating human rights situation” in both countries, the White House said.

Obama used the backdrop of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum to announce the new measures – along with a stepped-up U.S. effort to detect and deter mass killings and genocide.

“Too often, the world has failed to prevent the killing of innocents on a massive scale,” said Obama, who was introduced at the event by Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel. “We are haunted by the atrocities that we did not stop and the lives we did not save.”

The executive order Obama signed establishes financial and U.S visa sanctions against those who perpetrate or assist in what the White House calls “Grave Human Rights Abuses Via Information Technology” in Syria and Iran – or GHRAVITY. It comes amid fighting in Syria despite a cease-fire and as Obama has come under criticism from some Republicans who say the U.S. needs to get tougher with Syrian leader Basher Assad.

Obama called the sanctions on the governments and private tech companies “one more step that we can take toward the day that we know will come – the end of the Assad regime that has brutalized the Syrian people.”

“These technologies should be in place to empower citizens, not to repress them,” he said.

Treasury officials said the order targets people involved in developing technology “that could assist in or enable human rights abuses.” Treasury imposed sanctions on the Syrian General Intelligence Directorate, its director Ali Maluku, Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran’s Law Enforcement Forces, the Iranian Internet service provider Data Telecom, and the Syrian communication firm Striate.

All but Data already had been targeted for sanctions by Treasury under other violations. Under the new sanctions, any property in the U.S. in which they have an interest will be blocked, and Americans are prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

Although Iran and Syria are targeted in the order, an administration official noted that Obama has the authority to impose sanctions on other countries if he chooses. The administration targeted Iran and Syria, the administration official said, “because of the ongoing and increasing use of technology by those governments to target people for grave human rights abuses.”

Obama raised the specter of the Holocaust and past massacres in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur to promise a focus on preventing genocide that involves nearly a dozen federal agencies.

“This is not an afterthought,” he said. “This is not a sideline in our foreign policy.”

The Atrocities Prevention Board, which will be chaired by Samantha Power, the White House National Security Council senior director for multilateral and humanitarian affairs, was to meet for the first time Monday at the White House and report to Obama in six months.

It also will monitor the National Intelligence Council’s preparation of the first-ever national intelligence estimate on the global risk of mass atrocities and genocide and will work with the director of national intelligence to include information about mass atrocity threats in the annual threat assessment to Congress.

“Across government, alert channels will ensure that information about unfolding crises and dissenting opinions quickly reach decision makers, including me,” Obama said.

He said that the Treasury Department will work to more quickly deploy financial tools to block the flow of money to abusive regimes and that the State Department would improve its ability to “surge our diplomats and experts in a crisis.”

And he said the U.S. Agency for International Development will challenge high-tech companies to help create new technologies to quickly expose violations of human rights.

“We need to be doing everything we can to prevent and respond to these kinds of atrocities because national sovereignty is never a license to slaughter your people,” Obama said.

He also announced that the U.S. will continue to deploy U.S. military advisers to assist Uganda and other regional African forces that are pursuing the murderous Lord’s Resistance Army, led by rebel Joseph Konya.

He called it part of a “regional strategy to end the scourge that is the LRA and help realize a future where no African child is stolen from their family and no girl is raped and no boy is turned into a child soldier.”

He noted that later this spring he will posthumously award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Jan Karaka, a young Polish Catholic “who witnessed Jews being put on cattle cars, who saw the killings, and who told the truth, all the way to President Roosevelt himself.”

Obama also used his speech to defend his policy toward Iran, which has come under criticism from his Republican rivals, who accuse him of failing to convince the country to abandon its quest for nuclear weapons. Analysts, however, have said that the administration has imposed some of the toughest sanctions against Iran in the regime’s history.

Campaigning in Pennsylvania ahead of Tuesday’s primary, Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney called Obama’s approach to Iran one of his great failings.

“When he came into office he should have put into place aggressive, crippling sanctions against Iran,” he said. “And then over the last year or two he’s been acting like he’s more concerned that Israel might take action to get rid of (Iran’s) nuclear weapons than he is about Iran developing nuclear weapons.”

Obama told the crowd at the museum, which included Holocaust survivors, that he’s promised he will “always be there for Israel.”

“When faced with a regime that threatens global security and denies the Holocaust and threatens to destroy Israel, the United States will do everything in our power to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Human rights groups applauded the focus on genocide prevention.

“This new ‘all of government approach’ reflects hard-learned lessons from tardy responses to past humanitarian crises,” said Frank Jannuzi, Amnesty International USA’s deputy executive director for advocacy, policy and research.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/04/23/3572289/obamas-new-sanctions-against-syria.html#storylink=cpy

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

    Archives:



Subscribe

Enter your E-mail address in the box below and subscribe to our feed. You will recieve our site updates in your E-mail inbox!

 
    • Blog
    • About
    • My Book
    • Human Rights
    • Projects
    • Events
    • Contact

Roxana Saberi © 2009 All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Flyte New Media